Government Of Malaysia V Gurcharan Case Summary

The court held that the money given for education came under necessaries and therefore the defendant was bound to pay back.

Government of malaysia v gurcharan case summary. This case is about the government of malaysia as the plaintiff whom had sued gurcharan singh the first defendant whom is a promisor of a contract and ors as the second and third defendant whom act as the sureties of the contract for breaching the. So a contract was made with the defendant. In government of malaysia v. Loh kooi choon v.

Gurcharan singh ors 19711 1 211 the government sued the first defendant the minor and the second and third defendants the sureties for breach of contract. Later the defendant refused to pay back the money. At the time when the contract was made the first. However he may be also be charged under section 5 of the firearms act 1971 which carries the penalties of imprisonment for life and whipping not less than 6 strokes.

Contract infant agreement to serve government in consideration for being trained as a teacher whether void whether sureties liable necessaries whether training constitutes provision for necessaries liability of infant and sureties provisions for repayment on breach of contract whether. View academics in case analysis government of malaysia vs gurcharan singh on academia edu. Government of malaysia 1977 2 mlj 187 is a case decided in the federal court of malaysia concerning the rights and freedoms guaranteed by the constitution and also involving the extent to which parliament can amend the constitution. Facts this case is about the government of malaysia as the plaintiff whom had sued gurcharan singh the first defendant whom is a promisor of a contract and ors as the second and third defendant whom act as the sureties of the contract for breaching the contract made between them.

Government of malaysia v. The amount of claim was rm11 500 being the sum spent by the government for the minor s education. Contract of scholarship government of malaysia v. Government of malaysia v.

Government spent rm 11 500 for the defendant for his education purpose when he was a minor student. Government of malaysia v. Facts this case is about the government of malaysia as the plaintiff whom had sued gurcharan singh the first defendant whom is a promisor of a contract and ors as the second and third defendant whom act as the sureties of the contract for breaching the contract made between them. Government of malaysia v.

Gurcharan singh ors case review 773 words 4 pages facts this case is about the government of malaysia as the plaintiff whom had sued gurcharan singh the first defendant whom is a promisor of a contract and ors as the second and third defendant whom act as the sureties of the contract for breaching the contract made between them. The decision was delivered by federal justice raja azlan shah. Gurcharan singh ors 1971 1 mlj 211 chang min tat j catchwords. In the case of ah thian v government of malaysia subject was charged under section 372 and 379 of penal code for offences of robbery and armed robbery with attempt to cause death.

Summary of key facts 1.